|
Chatsworth Community News
August 2002
CONGRESS MUST PASS STRONG CHECKS ON CORPORATE MALFEASANCE
by Congressman Brad Sherman
When President Bush addressed Wall Street and the nation about corporate
accountability, we heard big rhetoric. What we need is legislation, not a
lecture. We need policy, not a pep talk. However, my fear is that little
will be done; and then, with audacity that would make Arthur Andersens
David Duncan blush, the Congress will announce that the problem is solved.
There are many ideas on how to strengthen the system. Some of these ideas
have been considered, while others have not. They all deserve additional attention.
For starters, the top one thousand companies should be audited
every six months instead of every year. This would only modestly increase
audit cost. The world operates more than twice as fast as it did when the
1933 Securities Act was adopted, and investors should not have to wait for
over a year for audited financial statements. Of course we need audits we
can rely on.
By only one vote, the House Financial Services Committee
rejected a measure instructing the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
to review the filings of the top one thousand companies, and demand
clarification where necessary. The SEC had not read Enrons financial
statements for four years allowing them to cover up with unintelligible
footnotes.
WorldCom is another client of Arthur Andersen, and this is not a
coincidence. Arthur Andersen was the only one of the major accounting firms
in which total authority to sign an audit opinion was vested in the
engagement partner the person responsible for golfing with the client, and
keeping the client happy, and getting the audit bill paid. At Arthur
Andersen, the technical quality review department operated on a "dont ask,
dont tell" basis where they only heard those questions that the
engagement partner felt like asking and the engagement partner was free to
ignore the answers.
Well over a month ago, I put forward an amendment that
would ban the "Arthur Andersen" structure of an auditing firm. The measure
would have required the technical review department to sign off on any audit
of a publicly traded corporation. While that amendment was defeated on
pretty much a party-line vote, I am going to continue to push my proposals
and others that would bring meaningful reform.
|